What's Wrong With Art: Art Itself - FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine covers contemporary art – News, Exhibitions and Interviews reported on from London

What’s Wrong With Art: Art Itself

Tabish Khan loves art and visits hundreds of exhibitions a year. But every now and then he comes across something in the art world that doesn’t meet his approval.

A few months ago I went to a performance by the interdisciplinary theatre company Clod Ensemble and fellow writer Paul Carey-Kent remarked how it could easily be considered performance art if it was in a gallery. I completely agree.

But it struck me that the same grey lines also exist between cinema and video art, virtual reality in art and gaming, spoken word art and poetry, and to some degree between music and sound art. Maybe the issue is the classification of ‘art’ that we all lean on and it’s time to stop separating it from the wider umbrella term of ‘the arts’?

If we broke down these barriers then it would free what we know as art from the confines of the gallery. The border between visual art and the performing arts is already starting to falter so let’s do away with it altogether.

It would also stop what I often see where visual art is viewed as offering something fresh, when if we’d all been keeping tabs with the wider arts we’d realise that it had already been done before. Another plus is it opens up the opportunity for a wider audience to engage with visual art. For example when I remarked that video art hasn’t seemed to learn from cinema, it struck me that any movie buff could easily find flaws with most video art editing.

The arts have always been about creativity and artists will keep crossing these boundaries irrespective of any definition of their art form, but if the classification was dropped officially then more artists may be more willing to be inter-disciplinary and there would be no concern of not fitting neatly in either world.

Instead what is today considered art could simply be split into more embracing categories such as film, performance, painting, sculpture etc., and inter-disciplinary if it doesn’t fit into one group. This doesn’t mean doing away with the word ‘art’ altogether as it will clearly still have much use as a descriptive classification so people know what to expect when they visit a museum of art, it’s the clearly delineated classification of work as art that has the potential to cause harm.

Guess I’ll have to stop calling myself an art critic then.

For more in this series, see my thoughts on Appointment only exhibitionsArtificial Intelligence replacing artistsEveryone’s a CriticPhoto LondonThe Turner Prize, Art for art’s sakeConceptual art is complicatedCondoHow performance art is presented in museumsFrieze week floozies, too much respect for an artist’s legacyopinions not being welcomean exhibition across three countriestackling race and gender in artartist-curatorsart fair hypetop 5s and top 10sour political art is terriblegap left by Brian Sewellhow art never learned from the Simpsonswhy artspeak won’t dieso-called reviewsbad reviews are bad for business, the $179m dollar headlineart fairs appealing to the massesfalse opening hourssize matters and what’s wrong with video art.

Image courtesy Clod Ensemble and Manuel Vason. 



Related Posts

Trending Articles

Join the FAD newsletter and get the latest news and articles straight to your inbox

* indicates required