Quantcast
What's Wrong With Art? Photo London - FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine covers contemporary art- News, Exhibitions, Interviews and cool art stuff reported on from London

What’s Wrong With Art? Photo London

Tabish Khan loves art and visits hundreds of exhibitions a year. But every now and then he comes across something in the art world that doesn’t meet his approval.

The 3rd edition of Photo London has now concluded, even though it now feels like an age ago. The numbers suggest it was bigger, more popular and commercially successful than ever.

While there were many good works across the participating galleries, there were a few kinks that still need working out.

The venue

Somerset House is a fantastic and cavernous venue but there are a few downsides. The corridors are narrow and it’s difficult to navigate, this could be helped by having the staff directing people to the less obvious areas. For example on Sunday the wings were busy but the best work was on the mezzanine which felt very empty — maybe because people had missed it as it’s tucked away.

Parts of Somerset House have to be open to the public so this results in queues as people hop from section to section having their tickets scanned at each point. Some people were able to avoid this via wristbands, but this didn’t apply to regular ticket holders. There must be a more efficient way to administer this.

Too much of the same

It did seem like at every turn there was a black and white nude photography. Of course nudity is part of photography but it seemed to be everywhere. A bit of smarter curation could have limited it, or at least asked some galleries to bring different artists to the fair.

The price

£29 is far too much for this fair even though it’s very big this year. This has Photo London drifting towards Frieze costs and that’s a high bar to meet. Frieze has ups and downs but it’s truly massive, littered with performances and the full portfolio the art world has to offer — including photography.

Photo London has some good works, but it’s nowhere near the level of excitement that Frieze generates. It also makes it far too restrictive for people who genuinely love photography from having access to it.

The verdict

It was still another solid year for Photo London, but it feels like it still have lots of room to grow and I’d expect an improvement next year.

For more in this series, see my thoughts on  The Turner Prize, Art for art’s sake, Conceptual art is complicatedCondoHow performance art is presented in museumsFrieze week floozies, too much respect for an artist’s legacyopinions not being welcomean exhibition across three countriestackling race and gender in artartist-curatorsart fair hypetop 5s and top 10sour political art is terriblegap left by Brian Sewellhow art never learned from the Simpsons, why artspeak won’t die, so-called reviewsbad reviews are bad for business, the $179m dollar headline, art fairs appealing to the masses, false opening hours, size matters and what’s wrong with video art.

Image copyright Guy Bourdin

Categories

Tags

Related Posts

Yusuke Akamatsu at Photo London

At first sight, Yusuke Akamatsu’s colourful and glossy prints evoke an urban, even playful aesthetic while titles like ‘The End […]

Photo London 2021

After a one-year pandemic-induced hiatus, Photo London is back with a bang, opening on a scorching September day at the […]

The Fair has Legs: Photo London

Photo London opens today (to 12 Sept), and where two years back people might have been wondering ‘Are there too many fairs?’ now it’s ‘Wow, a fair!’  And although there is a reduced international presence, especially from America and Asia, the 88 galleries have responded well. My guess is that more than half the images show people, and most of those give some focus to the face. But what about the legs? Here is a selection…

Trending Articles

Submit Your Work

Submit your work to be featured on FAD