Daniel's Value and Ideas #73: The Interpretation of Freud - FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine

FAD Magazine covers contemporary art- News, Exhibitions, Interviews and cool art stuff reported on from London

Daniel’s Value and Ideas #73: The Interpretation of Freud

Lucian Freud, in bed with Kate Moss

A collection of Lucian Freud’s letters is to go on sale at Sotheby’s on 2nd July with an estimate of up £42,000. The letters were written to the poet, thirteen years his senior, Stephen Spender, while Freud was studying at the East Anglian School of Painting and Drawing between 1939 and 1942. Such is the affection between the two men, it has been thought that they were engaged in a homosexual relationship.

It is well known that Freud could resist the pleasures of the flesh as scarcely as he could resist painting. If he had been in his prime now, he would be the subject of relentless media frenzy, but his golden years took place in a more private time. In addition to two marriages, Freud slept with fifty women later in life, although this seems like a conservative estimate, producing no less than fourteen children. It is also known that he had the occasional fling with a man or two. Indeed, Freud’s legendary promiscuity makes a nonsense of any attempt to codify his behaviour according to norms of either society or sexuality, with the best effort at classification simply being that he was a very horny boy. It is therefore possible, although by no means likely, that Freud was shtupping Spender.

Spender’s role in all this is much less vague – or perhaps just more clearly documented – insofar as his predilection for the boys is crystallised in his relationship with Tony Hyndman, whom he met in 1933 and was involved with until 1936. During this time, however, he had an affair with a woman, Muriel Gardiner, writing to his friend Christopher Isherwood, ‘I find boys much more attractive…but I find the sexual act with a woman much more satisfying’. Nonetheless, after a brief marriage to another woman, Spender eventually married the concert pianist Natasha Litvin, which last until his death 54 years later.

On the face of it, then, it is possible that Freud and Spender were involved in a relationship, given that both slept around a bit without much concern for the boundaries of sexual orientation. But before we get all over excited about this new gay angle to Freud we should consider both a disparity between the two characters and a facet of the times in which they were living.

Firstly, the historical facts suggest that Spender was markedly more gay than Freud, who really just seemed to like sticking his dick in things to pass the time in between paintings. Spender, on the other hand, expressed a genuine desire to seek male company and was noticeably torn in his desires for men and women. There is nowhere in the Freud archive such an emotional or psychological awareness – not least a struggle – of a conflict of interest between the male and the female body. There is just unabashed philandering.

Secondly, in 1930s/40s England there was not such a rounded, defined or socially accepted concept of homosexuality into which we can slot either of these two men. In a society in which homosexual acts are illegal, the church still has great sway and social attitudes are generally barbaric in comparison to the freedom we enjoy today, people were not divided into streamline categories of gay and straight, with or without prejudice. At best, homosexual was a category that denoted something that could be, and should be, corrected or cured, rather than the denotation of a group of equal human beings who happen to do some things differently from some other people. There was, in short, none of this singing about girls who do boys like they’re girls who do girls like they’re boys uncertainty, but only the right way of doing things and the forbidden way.


One of Freud’s letters to Stephen Spender

Add to the mix two further facts, and we have ourselves a rather delicious mystery. One, Spender’s son, Matthew, says ‘Lucian, especially as a young man, was exactly the kind of young man my father would be incredibly attracted to’. Shut out the noise from the fact that we are talking here about an older man and a teenage boy, there is nothing to say his affections were reciprocated. However, Freud’s teenage years are a notorious blackspot in his biography and it is now thought this is perhaps why. And two, it is said that Spender’s homosexual escapades ended with his second marriage, which took place in 1941, right in the middle of the period in which he was writing the letters to Freud.

We have here the makings of a sensational headline so oblique that it comes to almost nothing: a dude who occasionally liked dudes wrote some letters to a dude who very occasionally liked dudes, suggesting that perhaps these two dudes liked and knew each other in the biblical sense. Or an established poet befriended a fledgling painter in the misty fog of wartime Britain and they wrote some tender letters to one another. Either way, we have a faint glimmer of another side to Lucian Freud in these letters, which, in all honesty will do less to contextualise his painting than they will to muddy the waters further. And that, for a painter of such profound complexity, is precisely as it should be.

Words: Daniel Barnes



Related Posts

The New Old Normal Value and Ideas #104

It was on a warm August morning back in 2014, sitting in a curry house in a side street off Brick Lane, when Gilbert told me he had been at Wembley for the 1966 World Cup Final.

Damien Hirst End of a Century FAD magazine

More than Just Seeing Value and Ideas #103

Art is something we experience, and not just something we see. And learning this lesson is crucial if we are to avoid the very intellectual fabric of art being eroded and lambasted by travesties such as Van Gogh: The Immersive Experience, which plays into the hands of populism but does egregious harm to the integrity of the experience art.

Beeple (b. 1981), EVERYDAYS: THE FIRST 5000 DAYS 21,069 x 21,069 pixels (319,168,313 bytes) Minted on 16 February 2021. This work is unique.

Nothing Lasts Forever Value and Ideas #102

$69.3 million is a lot of money to spend on something you cannot touch, that does not occupy space and that cannot even be seen without flicking a switch. Now the dust has settled on Beeple’s epic auction debut, it is time to soberly consider whether it is worth it. Spoiler – it probably is! We are, after all, living in the future.

Trending Articles

Submit Your Work

Submit your work to be featured on FAD